true that scholastics invented what they
professed to be logical arguments proving the existence of God, and
that these arguments, or others of a similar tenor, have been accepted
by many eminent philosophers
destroyed by Darwin; and in any
case, could only be made logically acceptable at the cost of abandoning
God’s omnipotence.
Apart from logical cogency, there is to me something a little odd
about the ethical valuations
rejecting an omnipotent and benevolent God.
However, this death and destruction is a result of the misuse of the
God-given freedom of man, rather than the direct intent of God’s plan.
Considering this, the argument
Read Section