been absolutely nothing,
something had to have always been in existence. That ever-existing
thing is what we call God. God is the uncaused Being that caused
everything else to come into existence. God is
can accept that the universe
came about without a Creator—which in
any case is not rational—then, what is the
problem with accepting such a Creator (God)
without a creator? If we are ready to accept
and
declaration of a First Cause still leaves open the
question, “Who created the creator?” After all, what is the difference
between arguing in favour of an eternally existing creator versus an
eternally existing
Read Section